C-Sections Are Killing Women And We Must Speak Up
About one in three women in America deliver their babies via cesarean section. The cesarean is a lifesaving and a truly beautiful modern invention when used appropriately. But the c-section is also dangerous, just how dangerous we are only beginning to understand. A c-section is particularly dangerous to a woman when she has more and more of them. This phenomena of women having multiple c-sections is growing as resistance to VBAC (vaginal birth after cesarean) grows stronger.
I read this story today out of Utah. A mother, pregnant with her sixth baby died from complications due to placenta accretia. She had birthed every one of her babies via cesarean section. Complications like that are GREATLY increased with each additional cesarean section.
There is certainly a possibility that she needed every single one of those c-sections. I am going to assume that she did and that she was well aware of the risks that they posed and that her doctors had been honest and kind to her.
But I can tell you right now that I have talked to women whose doctors assured them (after a quick diagnosis of CPD after a normal amount of pushing) that they could "Have 10 c-sections!" without a problem. This is disturbing, particularly when we consider that real women with real families are dying because of our cut happy, impatient, fearful of liability culture of birth. I sincerely believe that some of these women are dying unnecessarily.
And I'm not crazy.
This news story points out that hospital c-section rates vary an incredible amount- from single digit percentages to around 70%. This indicates that c-sections aren't done so often because of NEED but rather because of variations in CARE.
This article points out that the World Health Organization claims that cesarean rates over 15% are too high.
This abstract points out that the risk of cesarean birth is more dangerous than vaginal birth by a factor of 2-11.
But I have been a little scared lately to say anything about the truth regarding the risks of various birthing interventions.
Why?
There has been a rash of political correctness spreading it's venom about the world as of late and it has taken its toll in the natural birth community. Sometimes the proponents of this talk about how they "support all choices" or blab about how "judgemental" anybody is who dares have an opinion.
My goodness, I said on my Facebook page the other day that stirrups in labor were dumb and people actually acted like I was an evil person. Somebody said it was a "valid choice" if mom wants it. Sorry folks, but if you think that the stirrup used for pushing during labor and delivery was ever designed for your comfort, safety (not to mention your perineum) then you are either blind or ignorant. The stirrup was designed for ease of use for the physician. More clearly, it was designed so that while you were laying flat on your back with your legs UP IN THE AIR (you defy gravity! YAY!) he could easily cut you from stem to stern and pull your baby out with a metal object. (And even if stirrups and birthing on your freaking back was actually five kinds of awesome, I am entitled to believe it is dumb. I am allowed an opinion in the USofA.)
Yes the stirrup is a valid choice for a birthing woman. I just don't happen to think that it is a very good one (MOST OF THE TIME). Did you notice my disclaimer? You have to put those in or the vultures descend.
And now the c-section is a valid choice. People get angry if I say I liked natural birth. This makes me "unsupportive" of "choices".
I can't take it any more. I am just going to say it. C-sections are more dangerous. They are necessary sometimes. But 1 out of 3 women? This is mind boggling. We can take beautiful pictures of c-section birth. We can talk about it being empowering. We can talk about it being necessary. C-section might be all of these things. But the pretty pictures and the support of "choices" doesn't change the fact that women are dying because of this procedure.
And because c-section is done TOO OFTEN (I firmly believe that this surgery is performed far more than necessary) we can safely assume that women are literally DYING who didn't need to die.
Was that clear?
Women are dying from surgeries to deliver their babies who didn't have to die. Women are dying from c-sections they didn't need. Women are having a lifetime of health issues from surgeries they didn't need.
You can talk about this all day long like it is a rose colored life choice but it is much more than that.
Cesarean is major surgery. Cesarean is more dangerous than vaginal birth. Cesareans save lives when they are used appropriately. And cesareans (at worst) kill people when they are used inappropriately.
This is something that should be shouted from the rooftops. This is something that every pregnant woman should know before she goes into labor with her first baby.
I wish we would stop glorifying the "gentle" cesarean. I wish we would stop acting like all choices are the best choice. There are lots of choices. They are probably mostly good some of the time. But ALL choices aren't the RIGHT choice. My saying so just means that I am willing to speak the truth.
When we act like everything is good and nothing is wrong and any birth, anyway, anyhow, is just fine we help perpetuate a system that is killing women.
I am not OK with that and I never will be.
Women who care about birth can do better by each other. We need to start telling the truth- not with hate- but truth nonetheless. I can love a women who schedules her births and still honestly stand up and say that c-section is more dangerous than vaginal birth. Because c-section is more dangerous than vaginal birth.
I am so tired of women dying who didn't have to die.
I am so tired of being told that all choices are equal and valid.
I am so very sad that women have bought into this line of bull so that they can feel a little better about themselves.
I am so sad that women have given up rather than fight to change the system.
I am sad that the sometimes necessary c-sections are being used to justify out-of-control c-section rates.
Ladies- we can change this c-section rate. We could do it OVERNIGHT.
All we would have to do is refuse to birth in hospitals or with doctors who have outrageous c-section rates. Guess what? They would change. They would have to. They need us to pay their car insurance.
But change doesn't happen if we are afraid to speak the truth. C-section rates doesn't get lowered when everybody pretends that c-sections are full of gentleness and pure awesome. They just don't.
But honesty. That changes things. Honesty even when it is hard or offensive. That changes things. That gets people thinking. That saves lives.
Take back your birth. Don't let the haters silence you. Make your voice heard. Make choices that are hard. Be honest with yourself and others. And then be smart enough to love people who choose different. Respect the opinions of others even when you disagree.
We can lower the c-section rate. We can save lives.
Comments
She accepted it, because she really didn't have another choice. But her doctor's decision infuriated me!
I've been horrified when I've had friends (and I've had several) tell me that they want to opt for c-sections for their first, electively. I've had three and oh-my-goodness... never, ever would I recommend it. After the first (up and about pushing for five hours) I was told that my pelvis was too small, but honestly I have no idea if that's actually true. The second I really regret, because I knew I didn't want a c-section and the hospital said they didn't do VBACs and I didn't know enough at that point to know that I could fight them on it. With my third I finally got a trial of labor again, with an awesome supportive OB (and I was super excited when my water broke naturally), but after 36 hours of labor (I was up walking around and doing hypno-babies) they did c-section #3, and found out that the baby, who had been head down when I got to the hospital, had turned and was transverse (what?!?!?!).
After all of this, I am definitely mixed about c-sections. On the one hand I am thankful for them because of my first and third experiences. On the other I absolutely agree with everything you've said and I think they're overdone and I hate the way I've heard people talk about them like they're just a way to schedule birth and avoid labor. Great post! I wish I'd known more with the first two... I do wonder how different all three labors would have been if I'd read the right sources (I read a lot, but nothing that encouraged natural childbirth) when I was pregnant the first time around!
Sorry, I know it's OT, but I just wanted to share that I feel the exact same way that you do about these things and cheers to you for saying it.
While I cannot wait to get pregnant and have my first baby, I am not looking forward to finding a safe place to deliver said baby. Birth Centers wont take me for my weight and Hospitals are designed to be against me for the same reason.
However. That bridge will be crossed when I get to it. First bridge, overcoming infertility.
Thank you for speaking out about this! I completely agree! We need to do something, women deserve honesty. Women deserve doctors who WANT them to have a successful vaginal birth (and I do believe some doctors want their patients to have c-sections even when they aren't needed- I've seen it first hand).
2 weeks ago I just finished my training to become a natural birth instructor, and saw her about a week ago. She was asking questions, and asked (genuinely curious, no attitude), "Why would someone WANT a natural birth?" I talked to her about the high maternal/newborn death rate in this country, danger of c-sections, etc...and now this happens. To her sister in law. I wonder if she thinks about that conversation we had. Breaks my heart.
I too am expecting this summer, and planning on having my first natural birth as well as a VBAC. I am a little scared about doing it... but I want to try to avoid another C-section at all cost (which is why I'm on your blog reading good, positive natural birth stories! So thank you!). I find it very interesting that this same sister in law who is terrified to have her sixth C-section is also giving me a lot of flack for even considering a natural birth. C-sections aren't that bad... she says. It's nice to not have to deal with contractions and labor... HUH? I think that because the choice was taken away from her and she has no other option at this point she feels a little threatened by my taking a stand and NOT wanting another unwarranted C-section.
I completely agree that we have to make a stand. I recently also found a new OB at 22 weeks pregnant that is a member of ICAN and very pro VBAC and natural birth, where my other OB had a very high section rate. Yes, doctors are the ones with the degree and this is their job... but we are the client! They work for us! We are the ones that have to live with the side affects and complications from a C-section. And you are right, we are the ones that ultimately cut the pay check for them. So I'm taking baby steps on the way to this birth, and hopefully each one will take me farther away from another C-section. I agree that sometimes they are needed, but not at the rate they are being handed out.